circular to all 124 email-addresses
which are so far registered from all fellow-owners
Dear
neighbours,
re:
the financial situation of the
as per
31-12-2005 according to the “bilance” sent to you all one week
ago
A/ for your information
B/ proposal how to take action
A 1./
during our AGM on 21-05-2006 the short professional judgement of the displayed
fragmented financial information
was announced that the MG accounts are being
depleted systematically + all
owners were informed about this also in writing by
the minutes displayed on our
website:
The result of an
evaluation of the provided Trans-Intan “bilance” performed last week by
a
tax & accountancy
specialist has reconfirmed the concerns and has raised many
questions.
The conclusion in
shortform is this: the worst thinkable situation had become fact for
us
if we don’t take
action all owners will have to setup a new Sinking Fund once the responsibility
is taken over, either
as a 1-time-payment of RM 4-5,000 or by monthly extra RM
200-250
or by a mix of
both!
►
“BESIDES” the CONTRACT ACT forces the developer to handle things with
trustworthyness:
despite we all signed
the Supplementary Agreement (hv you ever read whay you
signed???)
taking/using the
Sinking Fund for unjustified things would be considered a breach of confidence
towards the buyer who
agreed to sign a Supplementary Agreement and to entrust the developer
with e.g. RM 4,000.-
(respt. Constantly with a part of the monthly service
charge)
2./
The provided “bilance” is actually not a bilance – as it is certified by the
developer
Himself: the figures on paper are neither officially certified nor officially
audited,
The “Auditor’s Report” has not been provided:
All figures must be
doubted.
3./
The Sinking Fund is not RM 1.7 anymore?
The fixed deposit
account does not exist, the f/d shown to me during March 2006 were
expired f/d
accumulating only RM 1.2 mio!
Why are expenditures
debited to this account which should be fixed for 10-15-20
years!?
4./
While all costs occurred for the Mimi Green Resort were particularly booked +
paid
Trans-Intan separately additionally debited RM 305,000.- for Management
Fees!
This means, we paid
all costs anyway
and pay extra RM
25,000 monthly as a Friendship-Fee ???
We need to see this
Management-Contract to understand and to evtlly
accept.
5./
“Bilance” page 1:
Accumulated Fund, Common Fund = is
not Sinking Fund but “Paid Capital”
This should not
vary!
6./
“Bilance” page 1:
Surplus of income over
expenditure:
in 2004 a profit was achieved of RM 547,623.-
in 2005 a loss was created of RM 17,808.-
Many costs were
encreased vs 2004:
Management Friendship
Fee = + 18%
Cleaning
Maintenace: basis page2 = +16 % / basis page 9 = +250
%
Landscape Maintenace:
basis page2 = +40 % / basis page 9 = +90 %
Security Charges:
basis page3 = +30 % / basis page
9 = +200 %
“Other payable”:
page
9 = +300 %
7./
Electricity and Water: charges in 2005 RM 288,343./ =
+21%
Can this be
???
8./
Upkeep of common area RM 78,538 = +10%
In addition to
Cleaning & Landscaping ???
9./
Slope stabilization expenses
in 2005 RM
599,944.-
in 2004 RM
338,873.-
Before the Miami Green
resort was created it was a tea plantation:
Trans-Intan was not
the original developer (who went bancrupt) but bought it in a stage
“x”
and created the Miami
Green Resort:
at the time the O.C. /
C.F. for blocks A,B,C,D,E,F were issued the slope-works MUST
have
been finished: if
later it turned out that
►
either the contractor had done a louzy job so that new/additional works became
necessary:
in such case the contractor would be reliable and reparation works should be
carried out by
him under warranty, or he should at least pay for it (alternatively his
insurance)
►
or/if Trans-Intan originally had tendered out/ordered the first
slope-works at a too low
measure (for example to save costs from their account) which did not co0rrespond
to what
was necessary = it would be Trans-Intan’s responsibility for which not we owners
should pay!
BB
/ Proposal:
I suggest the
“Speakers” of “the Miami Green Cash Buyer Action Committee” write a letter to
the developer in
which they present the above questions and request him to explain them
pls.
In the same letter we
should state that we are prepared and authorized by all
fellow-owners
“to forgive and to
forget” and to renouce on any publicity for the case that the developer
will pay back any
amount into the Maimi Green accounts as a consequence of this polite
enquiry.
Dear
all,
please, do you agree
to my above proposal?
Besides, “I cannot
imagine that the developer should chose not to answer” because he knows
we would go public
and would engage a lawyer! The Lawmaker’s setup besides is this:
► with 30 days from
the developer’s First AGM the developer has to hand over the accounts
to
us owners (to the Council of the future MC)
► from receipt of the
accounts runs a period of 45 days during which the future
Council
could take legal proceedings against the developer if considered
necessary,
which includes that we could submit any suspicious invoices paid to contractors
to the
inland revenue board for verification…
► I am convinced that
the developer will cooperate with us because he must prefer a friendly
arbitrage & settlement with us directly!
It is clear that he
must avoid a public court case and connected with it any bad publicity with
the press on
hundreds of private
and semi-governmental institutions / organizations / banks / associations
/
companies in Pulau
Pinang.
WE HAVE GOT these
approx. 1,000 emails addresses (!) in Penang incl. a few in the
BUT we will NOT use
it for now because our interest and intention is to have full accounts at the
developer’s First AGM
!
…the developer
besides knows about it, all as we keep him informed about everything we do
in
our resort including
this circular-mail…
With kind
regards,
Jens
|
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.13.1/466 - Release Date:
10/7/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.13.1/466 - Release Date:
10/7/2006